It seems that whenever there's an issue to be addressed concerning the nature of Black America, the elite Blacks come out with their dictionaries to explain why everyone should pay homage to the plight of the Black man in America. Multi-syllable words are use to educate the educated on the complexities of the Black American experience. It would seem as if these experts in Blackness are convinced that the race lacks diversity of thought and are motivated by one goal only.
Since the beginning of Black history, we have always sought out different means to an end just as with this D'Jango issue. Look at the "Black leaders" of throughout history. Marcus Garvey was convinced that the aim of the Blacks was to move back to Africa. Malcolm X felt that the Black man should demand respect and equality "by any means necessary." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. felt that the best approach to equality would be achieved through nonviolent persistence. These are only 3 views during post-slavery America; all had a following. Logically, one can deduce that Blacks were torn on a "best practice" to gaining respect and equal treatment. Why should today be any different?
The movie is offensive to our ancestors. Oh really? We have constantly been lead to believe that our ancestors are these strong willed individuals that stood for right and good; they were wrongfully oppressed; true, but that does not automatically make each one of them this figure of virtue. In our own families, we have relatives that have no interest in carrying the torch for the Black man in the ongoing struggle for fair treatment. There are those in our society today that could give two fucks about how their actions impact the way their race is viewed. It's no secret that there were those that lacked the will to pursue independence after the chains of slavery were lifted. They clung to the old system because they were conditioned that way. Even though this is an effect of the divisive destruction of the institution of slavery, it permeates down into our culture today. These weakened people did not die off; their legacy has been passed on; therefore, they are our ancestors also. How offended can one be of an institution that he/she was afraid to leave?
As for the people that are proponents for the film, please allow those that have an opposing view have their opinions. For wrong, right, or ridiculous, it just an opinion. There's no need to convince someone to see a movie that they have prejudice against; I contend that there will be nothing said or viewed that will change their minds. There are also people that have no stance on the topic; they may or may not venture into a theater to see for themselves. Enjoy the damn movie, and quit seeking out people to debate over the historical inaccuracies, script writing, and so on and so forth. Everything is not made to be consumed by everyone. Outside of basic scientific needs, everything is extra credit.
As I rush to my close, I can't say that this movie offended my ancestors. I'm quite sure they were enslaved, but I cannot say that beyond a reasonable doubt. It's likely that my bloodline was never in bondage although slightly likely. I love how all these niggas are certified genealogist just because they put together a family tree that goes back more than two generations. For all you know, your great-great-great-great grandpappy was a masta blowin', dirty mackin', backstabbin' nigga hater or like Stephen.
I digress. Carry on with the useless banter that fuels my life.
Hey Spike, didn't you have Samuel calling a group of college kids a bunch of muthafuckas at a chicken joint in School Daze? He didn't call them nigga so I guess it's cool.
Where was all this back and forth following "Stinkmeaner Strikes Back" episode of Boondocks? Is it because Aaron McGruder is Black? I guess that's why Red Tails got a pass too.
Speaking of Boondooks, isn't D'Jango Unchained a spaghetti western take on the Catcher Freeman story with a twist?
No comments:
Post a Comment